Diabetes technology

The effect of continuous glucose monitoring feedback on glycaemic variability in youth with obesity: A within‐participant feasibility study

Pediatr ObesPublished Randomised crossover feasibility trial

Authors' conclusion

This trial supports the feasibility and acceptability of CGM use in youth with obesity. Given the exploratory nature of this study, longer-term research is needed to evaluate its effectiveness in modifying health behaviours and metabolic outcomes in this population.

Study context

Population
Youth aged 10–18 years with BMI above the 95th percentile; age 14.5 ± 2.2 years, HbA1c 5.5 ± 0.24%, 55% Hispanic, 59% female24 completed
Participants
27 participants
Comparison
Unmasked continuous glucose monitors (CGM) vs masked CGM
Primary endpoint
Feasibility: recruitment, retention and adherence rates
Methodological detailswithin-participant, 6-week, intention-to-treat
  • Within-participant
  • 6-week
  • Intention-to-treat

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Feasibility · 6 weeks

Recruitment rate (27 of 30 eligible enrolled)

90%

Completed protocol

24

Adherence, mean days over 42 days

35.1 days

87% of days

Further findings

Glycaemic variability metrics · 6 weeks

No significant difference between masked and unmasked conditions

Safety

CGM well tolerated, with no adverse effects reported

Original publication

The effect of continuous glucose monitoring feedback on glycaemic variability in youth with obesity: A within‐participant feasibility study. Pediatr Obes. Published 1 July 2025. doi:10.1111/ijpo.70035

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.