Diabetes technology

Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy During Exercise in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

J Diabetes Sci TechnolPublished Prospective accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

This CGM system showed alterations in accuracy during exercise. Our findings additionally suggest interstitial fluid changes in muscles during exercise alter accuracy of CGM; however, additional research is required.

Study context

Population
Adolescents (13–20 years) with T1D exercising on a treadmill for 40 minutes, with a 10-minute break at minute 20
Comparison
Dexcom G6 CGM vs glucometer during exercise; CGM on buttocks vs abdomen
Outcome
Accuracy of the Dexcom G6 vs glucometer (MARD, MAD, Clarke Error Grid)
Follow-up
Before, every 10 minutes during and after exercise

Performance

As reported in the abstract

CGM accuracy during exercise

Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) increased during exercise, improved after exercise

14%-33%

Mean absolute difference (MAD) increased during exercise, improved after exercise

24.3-34 mg/dL

Further findings

OutcomeOR (95% CI)P value
Accuracy by CGM location (buttocks) · during exerciseOdds of Clarke error grid Zone A0.146 (0.052–0.415)P = 0.0003
Accuracy by CGM location (buttocks) — MARD increased markedly with CGM on the buttocks
18%-46%
Accuracy by CGM location (buttocks) — MAD increased markedly with CGM on the buttocks
30-41 mg/dL

Original publication

Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy During Exercise in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. Published 1 September 2022. doi:10.1177/19322968221120433

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.