Type 2 & other diabetes

Disparities in GLP-1 and GIP responses to small intestinal glucose infusion in individuals with well- and poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes

Diabetes Res Clin PractPublished Mechanistic study

Authors' conclusion

Poor glycaemic control in T2D is associated with a greater GIP, and lower GLP-1, response to small intestinal glucose, independent of intestinal glucose absorption. However, differences in GLP-1 may be influenced by age, sex and BMI, so should be interpreted cautiously and validated in larger cohorts.

Study context

Population
Diet-controlled participants with T2D receiving intraduodenal infusion of 30 g glucose with 3 g 3-OMG over 30 min
Participants
24 participants
Comparison
Poorly-controlled vs well-controlled T2D
  • Poorly-controlledn = 12
  • Well-controlledn = 12reference
Outcome
GLP-1 and GIP responses to intraduodenal glucose infusion
Methodological detailsintraduodenal glucose infusion, 3-OMG as marker of intestinal glucose absorption, blood glucose clamped by IV insulin
  • Intraduodenal glucose infusion
  • 3-OMG as marker of intestinal glucose absorption
  • Blood glucose clamped by IV insulin

Further findings

GIP iAUC0-60min · 0–60 min · greater GIP response with Poorly-controlled

P = 0.02 for time*group interaction

GLP-1 iAUC0-60min · 0–60 min · lower GLP-1 response with Poorly-controlled

P = 0.007 for time*group interaction

OutcomeP value
GIP iAUC0-60min · 0–60 minTrend for higher iAUC with Poorly-controlledP = 0.12 unadjusted; P = 0.09 adjusted for age, sex and BMI
GLP-1 iAUC0-60min · 0–60 minP = 0.01
  • GLP-1 iAUC0-60min: lower with Poorly-controlled; non-significant after adjustment for age, sex and BMI

Basal hormones, C-peptide and 3-OMG responses

Basal hormone concentrations were comparable between groups
C-peptide and 3-OMG responses were comparable

Original publication

Disparities in GLP-1 and GIP responses to small intestinal glucose infusion in individuals with well- and poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Published 1 April 2026. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113235

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.