Completeness of intervention reporting of nutrition-focused weight management interventions adjunct to metabolic and bariatric surgery: effect of the TIDieR checklist
Authors' conclusion
Nutritional weight management interventions in MBS care are still below the desirable standards for reporting.
Study context
- Population
- Trials of nutrition-focused weight management interventions adjunct to metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS)22 trials
- Outcome
- Completeness of intervention reporting per the TIDieR checklist
Methodological detailsmethodological study, TIDieR checklist assessment, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and parallel group trials, Searched PubMed, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials
- Methodological study
- TIDieR checklist assessment
- RCTs, quasi-RCTs and parallel group trials
- Searched PubMed, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials
Pooled result
As reported in the abstract
TIDieR items fully reported (of 12)
Items fully reported, mean ± SD
6.6 ± 1.9
Studies completely reporting all intervention descriptors
0
Further pooled results
Reporting quality after vs before TIDieR release
- Quality of intervention reporting remained the same after vs before TIDieR release
Factors associated with better intervention reporting
- Industrial funding
- P = 0.02
- Study recorded within a registry platform
- P = 0.08
Original publication
Completeness of intervention reporting of nutrition-focused weight management interventions adjunct to metabolic and bariatric surgery: effect of the TIDieR checklist. Int J Obes (Lond). Published 8 March 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →