Lipids & metabolic liver disease

Atherogenic index of plasma and coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Cardiovasc DiabetolPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Pooled result · CADResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 2.79 95% CI 1.75–4.45

Authors' conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrates that elevated AIP is strongly associated with increased CAD risk, greater severity, and poorer prognosis in populations with and without established CAD. However, more studies are needed to evaluate the predictive performance and determine the optimal cut-off for AIP in different populations.

Study context

Population
Populations with and without established coronary artery disease (CAD); cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science to August 13, 2024)51 observational studies
Comparison
Higher vs lower atherogenic index of plasma (AIP)
Outcome
Relationship between AIP and CAD risk, severity and prognosis
Methodological detailsrandom-effects model, multivariate analysis
  • Random-effects model
  • Multivariate analysis

Pooled result

CAD

Odds ratio

2.79

95% CI 1.75–4.45

P < 0.00001

Higher AIPvs Lower AIP
OR 2.79 (95% CI 1.75–4.45); P < 0.00001

As reported in the abstract

Further pooled results

OutcomeEstimateP value
Coronary artery calcificationHigher AIPvs Lower AIPOR 2.28 (95% CI 1.74–3.00)P < 0.00001
Multivessel CADHigher AIPvs Lower AIPOR 2.04 (95% CI 1.50–2.77)P < 0.00001
Plaque progressionHigher AIPvs Lower AIPOR 1.49 (95% CI 1.17–1.91)P = 0.001
MACE, populations without established CADHigher AIPvs Lower AIPHR 1.28 (95% CI 1.22–1.35)P < 0.00001
MACE, acute coronary syndromeHigher AIPvs Lower AIPHR 1.59 (95% CI 1.33–1.89)P < 0.00001
MACE, chronic coronary syndrome or stable CADHigher AIPvs Lower AIPHR 1.65 (95% CI 1.15–2.37)P = 0.007

Original publication

Atherogenic index of plasma and coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Cardiovasc Diabetol. Published 22 January 2025. doi:10.1186/s12933-025-02582-2

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.