Validation of an early vascular aging construct model for comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment using external risk indicators for improved clinical utility: data from the EVasCu study

Cardiovasc DiabetolPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

This study validates a clustering model for EVA and highlights its association with established risk factors. EVA assessment can be integrated into clinical practice, allowing early intervention and personalized cardiovascular risk management.

Study context

Population
Healthy participants, EVasCu study, Spain
Participants
390 participants
Exposure
Early vascular aging (EVA) vs healthy vascular aging (HVA) cluster
Outcome
External validation of EVA cluster model
Methodological detailsK-means clustering with principal component analysis, external validation
  • K-means clustering with principal component analysis
  • External validation

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

  • EVA participants were older, with higher adiposity, poorer glycemic control, dyslipidemia, altered vascular properties and higher BP
  • Significant differences for age, smoking status, BMI, waist circumference, fat percentage, glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein, diabetes prevalence, lipid profiles, arterial stiffness and BP levels

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

Validation of an early vascular aging construct model for comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment using external risk indicators for improved clinical utility: data from the EVasCu study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. Published 13 January 2024. doi:10.1186/s12933-023-02104-y

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.