Diabetes technology

Using continuous glucose monitoring to prescribe an exercise time: a randomised controlled trial in adults with type 2 diabetes

Diabetes Res Clin PractPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Prescribing exercise to target peak hyperglycemia did not improve HbA1c; however cardiometabolic health outcomes improved in both groups prescribed an exercise time compared to control. Personalizing exercise prescription by prescribing a time to exercise may be a novel approach to improve health outcomes and physical activity participation.

Study context

Population
Adults with T2D (HbA1c 7.2 ± 0.8 %; age 63 ± 12 y; BMI 29 ± 5 kg/m²); peak hyperglycemia time from median of 14-d habitual continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Comparison
Daily exercise timed before or after CGM-determined peak hyperglycaemia vs waitlist control
Primary endpoint
HbA1c
Follow-up
8 weeks
Methodological detailswaitlist control, Linear mixed models compared changes across time between groups
  • Waitlist control
  • Linear mixed models compared changes across time between groups

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

  • No intervention effect for HbA1c

Further findings

OutcomeEstimate
24-h peak glucose change vs CTL · 8 weeksExPeak vs CTL · significantly lowered(95% CI −2.0 to −0.3)
24-h peak glucose change vs CTL · 8 weeksNonPeak vs CTL · significantly lowered(95% CI −2.3 to −0.6)
%FMD change vs CTL · 8 weeksExPeak vs CTL · increased(95% CI 0.6–1.5)
%FMD change vs CTL · 8 weeksNonPeak vs CTL · increased(95% CI 0.0–1.1)

24-h peak glucose change vs control (CTL) · 8 weeks

Significant group interaction for changes in 24-h peak glucose

%FMD change vs CTL · 8 weeks

Significant group interaction for changes in %FMD

Adherence

Adherence high in both intervention groups
>90 %

Original publication

Using continuous glucose monitoring to prescribe an exercise time: a randomised controlled trial in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Published 27 February 2025. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112072

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.