Gestational diabetes & diabetes in pregnancy

Use of fasting plasma glucose to determine the approach for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus

Diabetes Res Clin PractPublished Secondary analysis of the HAPO study

Authors' conclusion

HAPO mothers whose GDM diagnosis would be missed were not at greater risk for adverse neonatal and childhood outcomes than mothers with FPG of 4.5-5.0 without GDM.

Study context

Population
HAPO participants with 75-g OGTT at 24–32 weeks' gestation; follow-up OGTTs in mothers and children and child adiposity
Comparison
Women with GDM and FPG ≤ 4.4 mmol/L (Group 2) vs women with FPG > 4.4 mmol/L and no GDM (Group 3)
Primary endpoint
GDM diagnoses missed by performing OGTTs only on women with screening FPG of 4.5-5.0 mmol/L
Methodological detailsretrospective GDM classification by IADPSG criteria
  • Retrospective GDM classification by IADPSG criteria

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Missed GDM diagnosis with this strategy

GDM diagnosis missed

14.7%

Further findings

Neonatal outcomes (birthweight, percent neonatal fat, sum of skinfolds, cord C-peptide >90th percentiles)

Odds for neonatal outcomes in Groups 2 and 3 not different (ORs)
1.14 to 1.29

Maternal T2D and disorders of glucose metabolism at follow-up

Odds for T2D in mothers higher in Group 2 (OR)
3.51
Odds for disorders of glucose metabolism in mothers higher in Group 2 (OR)
2.57

Childhood impaired glucose tolerance or adiposity outcomes · follow-up

Odds for childhood impaired glucose tolerance or adiposity outcomes not different for Groups 2 and 3

Original publication

Use of fasting plasma glucose to determine the approach for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Published 13 October 2023. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110952

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.