Type 2 & other diabetes

Treatment intensification following glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: Comparative effectiveness analyses between different basal insulins. RESTORE ‐G real‐world study

Diabetes Obes MetabPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

2BI are a valuable option to intensify GLP-1 RA therapy. Switching to Gla-300 versus Deg-100 was associated with greater HbA1c improvement.

Study context

Population
People with T2D starting basal insulin as add-on to (ADD-ON) or in substitution of (SWITCH) GLP-1 RA therapy, electronic medical records of 32 Italian diabetes clinics
Exposure
Second- vs first-generation basal insulin (2BI vs 1BI) and Gla-300 vs Deg-100, added to or switched from GLP-1 RA
Outcome
HbA1c
Follow-up
6 months
Methodological detailsreal-world, propensity score adjusted, multicentre (32 Italian diabetes clinics)
  • Real-world
  • Propensity score adjusted
  • Multicentre (32 Italian diabetes clinics)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Estimated mean difference, % (95% CI)P value
2BIvs 1BIADD-ON cohort (N = 700)
−0.32(−0.62 to −0.02)
P = 0.04
2BIvs 1BISWITCH cohort (N = 2097)
−0.22(−0.42 to −0.02)
P = 0.03
Gla-300vs Deg-100SWITCH cohort starting 2BI (N = 688)
−0.89(−1.26 to −0.52)
P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeEstimateP value
FBG, ADD-ON cohort (N = 700) · 6 months2BI vs 1BI · propensity score adjusted−20.73 mg/dl (95% CI −35.62 to −5.84)P = 0.007
FBG, SWITCH cohort · 6 months2BI vs 1BI · propensity score adjusted−10.15 mg/dl (95% CI −19.04 to −1.26)P = 0.03
Body weight, SWITCH cohort · 6 months2BI vs 1BI · propensity score adjusted−0.67 kg (95% CI −1.30 to −0.04)P = 0.04
FBG, SWITCH cohort starting 2BI · 6 monthsGla-300 vs Deg-100 · propensity score adjusted−17.89 mg/dl (95% CI −32.45 to −3.33)P = 0.02

HbA1c, SWITCH cohort (N = 2097) · 6 months

Propensity score adjusted

HbA1c, SWITCH cohort starting 2BI (N = 688) · 6 months

Propensity score adjusted

HbA1c, propensity score matching sensitivity analysis

Benefit on HbA1c confirmed with propensity score matching
−0.55% (95% CI −1.02; −0.08); p = .02
  • Sensitivity analysis

Original publication

Treatment intensification following glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: Comparative effectiveness analyses between different basal insulins. RESTORE ‐G real‐world study. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 10 June 2024. doi:10.1111/dom.15697

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.