Type 2 & other diabetes

Prospective Test Performance of Nonfasting Biomarkers to Identify Dysglycemia in Children and Adolescents

Horm Res PaediatrPublished Prospective diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

HbA1c and nonfasting glucose tests had reasonable longitudinal discrimination identifying adolescents at risk for dysglycemia, but performance depended on outcome definition.

Study context

Population
Youth aged 8–17 years with overweight or obesity (BMI ≥85th percentile) without known diabetes
Participants
176 participants
Outcome
Glucose-defined dysglycemia (FPG ≥100 mg/dL or 2-h plasma glucose ≥140 mg/dL) or elevated HbA1c (≥5.7%) on two fasting 2-h OGTTs
Follow-up
Average of 1.1 years later
Methodological detailslongitudinal
  • Longitudinal

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Prediction of glucose-defined dysglycemia · follow-up
Test or modelAUC
Random glucose (RG)0.68 (95% CI: 0.55-0.80)
1-h GCT0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89)
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)0.70 (95% CI: 0.56-0.84)

AUC

Random glucose (RG)0.68 (95% CI: 0.55-0.80)
1-h GCT0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89)
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)0.70 (95% CI: 0.56-0.84)

Further findings

OutcomeHbA1cRG
Prediction of elevated HbA1c · follow-up
AUC0.93 [95% CI: 0.88-0.98]0.67 [95% CI: 0.54-0.79]

Prediction of elevated HbA1c · follow-up

Baseline HbA1c strong, RG moderate performance
1-h GCT, fructosamine (FA) and anhydroglucitol performed poorly

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Prospective Test Performance of Nonfasting Biomarkers to Identify Dysglycemia in Children and Adolescents. Horm Res Paediatr. Published 15 November 2022. doi:10.1159/000528043

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.