Type 2 & other diabetes

Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography Among Patients With and Without Diabetes: The Mass General Brigham CCTA registry

Cardiovasc DiabetolPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Among patients undergoing CCTA, CAD was more frequent and severe in those with diabetes, and the risk of CVD or MI increased with CAD severity, approximately doubling in each category when diabetes was present.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing CCTA at two medical centers, 2006–2024, without prior coronary artery disease (CAD), advanced kidney disease or malignancy; median age 56 (IQR 47–65); 45% women
Participants
22,377 patients
Exposure
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) vs without DM
  • DMn = 3,245
Outcome
Composite of:
  • CV death
  • Myocardial infarction (MI)
Follow-up
Median 6 years (IQR 3.9-9.5)
Methodological detailstwo medical centers, registry
  • Two medical centers
  • Registry

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Composite of:
  • CVD
  • MI
  • Primary outcome occurred more than twice as often with DM
  • DM vs non-DM: P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Obstructive CAD and primary outcome, adjusted

HR (95% CI)P value
Obstructive CAD (DM)DM · after adjustment2.9 (1.8–4.6)P < 0.001
Obstructive CAD (non-DM)non-DM · after adjustment2.7 (2.1–3.4)P < 0.001

CAD severity on CCTA

Obstructive CAD more frequent with DM
No CAD less common with DM

Primary outcome by CAD category

Event rates increased with CAD severity and remained higher with DM across all categories

Original publication

Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography Among Patients With and Without Diabetes: The Mass General Brigham CCTA registry. Cardiovasc Diabetol. Published 15 June 2026. doi:10.1186/s12933-026-03193-1

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.