Gestational diabetes & diabetes in pregnancy

Pharmacological Treatment for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis of 71 Randomised Controlled Trial

Diabetes Obes MetabPublished Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Authors' conclusion

Insulin use provides significant benefits in achieving glycaemic control and minimising maternal and foetal complications, and it has a favourable overall safety profile. Biguanide use may be associated with an increased risk of low birth weight

Study context

Population
Patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating glucose levels and maternal or neonatal complications; databases searched up to May 16, 2025
Participants
14,877 patients71 trials
Comparison
Pharmacologic treatments vs standard care
Outcome
Fasting glucose
Methodological detailsrandom-effects model, frequentist network meta-analysis, Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) certainty assessment
  • Random-effects model
  • Frequentist network meta-analysis
  • CINeMA certainty assessment

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Each group vs standard careMD, mmol/L (95% CI)
Sulfonylureas
−0.33(−0.55 to −0.1)
Insulin
−0.3(−0.4 to −0.21)
Biguanides
−0.2(−0.28 to −0.12)

Further pooled results

OutcomeMD (%) (95% CI)
HbA1cBiguanidesvs Standard care−0.1 (−0.16 to −0.03)
OutcomeOR (95% CI)
MacrosomiaInsulinvs Standard care0.51 (0.34–0.75)
MacrosomiaBiguanidesvs Standard care0.39 (0.26–0.59)
MacrosomiaSulfonylureasvs Standard care0.5 (0.31–0.79)

Safety

OutcomeOR (95% CI)
Low birth weightBiguanidesvs Standard care2.04 (1.04–4.01)

Premature delivery and neonatal hypoglycaemia

Sulfonylureas were found to be more easily get premature delivery and neonatal hypoglycaemia than biguanides

Original publication

Pharmacological Treatment for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis of 71 Randomised Controlled Trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 4 May 2026. doi:10.1111/dom.70823

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.