Performance of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Prospective, Single-Center Observational Study
Authors' conclusion
This study demonstrated that the accuracy of CGM in patients with ARF is lower than that in most outpatients and it is not affected by general patient factors. Whether CGM is beneficial to glucose management in the intensive care unit needs further evaluation.
Study context
- Population
- Adults with acute respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU)
- Participants
- 52 adults
- Exposure
- Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) vs arterial blood glucose (aBG) and point-of-care (POC) glucose as reference
- Outcome
- Accuracy of CGM (MARD, Bland-Altman, %15/15, %20/20, %30/30; Clarke error grid)
Methodological detailssingle-centre
- Single-centre
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
CGM accuracy
MARD
%15/15
%20/20
%30/30
Clarke zone A + B
| Outcome | aBG reference | POC reference |
|---|---|---|
| Paired values | 519 | 1504 |
| Bland-Altman mean deviation | 0.82 mmol/L | 0.81 mmol/L |
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
Effect of general patient factors on CGM accuracy
- CGM accuracy not affected by general patient factors
Original publication
Performance of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Prospective, Single-Center Observational Study. Endocr Pract. Published 13 June 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →