Diabetes technology

More Frequent Use of Glucose Alarms Is Associated with Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Specific Diabetes Education: Findings from the Dia·Link Diabetes Panel

Diabetes Technol TherPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

CGM-specific education has the potential to increase utilization of and response to alerts and alarms.

Study context

Population
Current continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) users with T1D or T2D in Germany (Dia·Link Diabetes Panel)86.2% T1D
Participants
453 users
Exposure
CGM-specific education vs none
Outcome
Utilization (use and responses) of glucose alerts and alarms
Methodological detailsonline survey
  • Online survey

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Regular use of low-glucose alerts
OR 5.43; P < 0.001
Regular use of low-glucose alarms
OR 2.03; P = 0.027
Regular use of rate of change alerts
OR 4.20; P = 0.009
Immediate reaction to low-glucose alerts
OR 5.23; P < 0.001
Immediate reaction to rate of change alerts
OR 3.75; P = 0.018

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

More Frequent Use of Glucose Alarms Is Associated with Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Specific Diabetes Education: Findings from the Dia·Link Diabetes Panel. Diabetes Technol Ther. Published 7 November 2023. doi:10.1089/dia.2023.0333

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.