Type 1 diabetes

Improved prediction of symptomatic type 1 diabetes using a luciferase‐based assay to measure (pro)insulin autoantibodies

Diabet MedPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

The IAA LIPS low-blood-volume, high-throughput technique identifies more individuals with the highest risk of diabetes.

Study context

Population
People with new-onset T1D and first-degree relatives (FDRs), of whom 91 developed diabetes during follow-upPeople with new-onset T1D 150 · first-degree relatives (FDRs) 619
Comparison
IAA by luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) vs micro-RBA
Outcome
Agreement in IAA status between RBA and LIPS, new-onset diabetes
Methodological detailscross-sectional observational
  • Cross-sectional observational

Performance

As reported in the abstract

RBA and LIPS agreement in IAA status in new-onset diabetes

88%

Further findings

High-moderate affinity IAA vs Low-affinity IAA

Positive IAA LIPS by IAA affinity in FDRs

P < 0.001

  • Positive IAA LIPS by IAA affinity in FDRs: 89 vs 22 FDRs

IAA LIPS positive vs IAA LIPS negative

20-year diabetes risk in FDRs positive for multiple other islet autoantibodies, by IAA LIPS status

P = 0.013

Independent contribution of IAA LIPS to diabetes risk

IAA LIPS added to diabetes risk independently of status/level of IAA by RBA, other autoantibodies and sampling age
P < 0.001

Original publication

Improved prediction of symptomatic type 1 diabetes using a luciferase‐based assay to measure (pro)insulin autoantibodies. Diabet Med. Published 23 April 2026. doi:10.1111/dme.70277

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.