Type 1 diabetes

Impact of Technology Introduction on Glycemic Control of People Living with Type 1 Diabetes in Belgium: An Observational, Real-World Study

Diabetes Technol TherPublished Repeated cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

Over 14 years, glycemic and lipid outcomes improved alongside near-universal CGM use and increasing adoption of HCL therapy.

Study context

Population
People living with T1D in a nationwide structured care program in Belgium with full reimbursement of diabetes technologies; adults and children/adolescents
Exposure
Audit periods 2010-2011 vs 2023-2024; Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) vs other technology modalities in 2023-2024
Outcome
Long-term trends in metabolic outcomes: HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, SBP and BMI
Methodological detailsobservational, real-world, nationwide structured care program, three audit periods (2010-2011, 2017-2018, 2023-2024), generalized estimating equations adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, insulin delivery and glucose monitoring modalities
  • Observational
  • Real-world
  • Nationwide structured care program
  • Three audit periods (2010-2011, 2017-2018, 2023-2024)
  • Generalized estimating equations adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, insulin delivery and glucose monitoring modalities

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

HbA1c in adults, trend across audit periods · 2010-2011 to 2023-2024

Adults: HbA1c decreased

from 7.9% (62.8 mmol/mol) to 7.5% (58.5 mmol/mol)

P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

HbA1c target attainment (<7%; <53 mmol/mol), adults · 2010-2011 to 2023-2024

Adults: target attainment increased
from 22.3% to 35.1%

HbA1c, children and adolescents · 2010-2011 to 2023-2024

Children and adolescents: HbA1c declined
from 8.0% (63.5 mmol/mol) to 7.6% (59.0 mmol/mol, P < 0.01)

HbA1c target attainment, children and adolescents · 2010-2011 to 2023-2024

Children and adolescents: target attainment rose
from 19.7% to 33.1% (P < 0.001)

Technology use · 2023-2024

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use
exceeded 90%
Insulin pump use, adults
25%
Insulin pump use, younger individuals
47%

Glycaemic outcomes with HCL vs other modalities, adults · 2023-2024

HCL: lower HbA1c vs other modalities (P < 0.001)
7.0%; 53.5 mmol/mol
HCL: higher TIR vs other modalities (P < 0.001)
73%
HCL: lower TBR vs other modalities (P < 0.001)
1.5%

LDL-C target attainment (<70 mg/dL; <1.8 mmol/L) · 2010-2011 to 2023-2024

LDL-C target attainment increased
from 18.3% to 37.4% (P < 0.001)

LDL-C target attainment in those with CVD (<55 mg/dL; <1.4 mmol/L) · 2010-2011 to 2023-2024

CVD: LDL-C target attainment increased
from 15.5% to 46.5% (P < 0.001)

Systolic blood pressure and obesity

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) remained stable
Obesity prevalence increased in all age groups

Original publication

Impact of Technology Introduction on Glycemic Control of People Living with Type 1 Diabetes in Belgium: An Observational, Real-World Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. Published 2 July 2026. doi:10.1177/15209156261464233

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.