Diabetes technology

Continuous Glucose Monitoring as an alternative for Cystic Fibrosis Related diabetes screening and diagnosis

Diabetes Res Clin PractPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

In this exploratory study, glucodensities show better discriminatory capacity than HbA1c and CGM classic metrics in distinguishing early mild CFRD. This study supports the need for future larger prospective studies to define the most accepted screening method for CFRD, as well as the optimal cut-off point of CGM metrics and/or glucodensities for the diagnosis of CFRD.

Study context

Population
Patients with cystic fibrosis with an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) within the previous 6 months who accepted wearing a Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) sensor for 14 days
Participants
38 patients
Comparison
HbA1c, classical CGM metrics and glucodensities vs OGTT for Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes (CFRD) diagnosis
Outcome
Ability of HbA1c, classical CGM indexes and glucodensities to distinguish CFRD based on OGTT
Methodological detailsprospective, observational, exploratory
  • Prospective
  • Observational
  • Exploratory

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Diagnostic accuracy for CFRD
Test or modelSensitivitySensitivity and specificitySpecificity
CGM TAR >180 mg/dL >6 %93 % (p = 0.042)— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract
CGM TAR >140 mg/dL >20 %— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract90 % (p = 0.032)
Glucodensities— not stated in the abstractover 85 %— not stated in the abstract

Sensitivity

CGM TAR >180 mg/dL >6 %93 % (p = 0.042)
CGM TAR >140 mg/dL >20 %— not stated in the abstract
Glucodensities— not stated in the abstract

Sensitivity and specificity

CGM TAR >180 mg/dL >6 %— not stated in the abstract
CGM TAR >140 mg/dL >20 %— not stated in the abstract
Glucodensitiesover 85 %

Specificity

CGM TAR >180 mg/dL >6 %— not stated in the abstract
CGM TAR >140 mg/dL >20 %90 % (p = 0.032)
Glucodensities— not stated in the abstract

— not stated in the abstract

Further findings

Patient preferences for CFRD screening

Preference for a simpler method such as HbA1c; CGM better accepted than OGTT

Original publication

Continuous Glucose Monitoring as an alternative for Cystic Fibrosis Related diabetes screening and diagnosis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Published 19 October 2025. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112952

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.