Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

Comparison of various treatment modalities for the management of bone marrow edema syndrome/transient osteoporosis in men and non-pregnant women: a systematic review

Osteoporos IntPublished Systematic review

Authors' conclusion

BMES/TO has been treated with many non-standardized measures due to the low number of highly reliable studies. Current literature shows promising results with regard to the reduction of the clinical course of BMES/TO, but further large multicenter randomized controlled trials, as well as standardized radiological and clinical scores, are warranted to acquire evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic algorithm.

Study context

Population
Men and non-pregnant women with bone marrow edema syndrome/transient osteoporosis (bone marrow edema syndrome (BMES)/transient osteoporosis (TO))36 articles
Participants
880 men
Comparison
Various treatment modalities for BMES/TO
Outcome
Pain resolution
Methodological detailsQuality assessed with modified Delphi technique, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria and Cochrane risk of bias tool
  • Quality assessed with modified Delphi technique, MINORS criteria and Cochrane risk of bias tool

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

  • <1 month: bisphosphonates more efficient than CD
  • 1-3 months: iloprost more efficient than bisphosphonates and CD
  • 3-6 months: bisphosphonates, iloprost and CD equal
  • 6-12 months: CD and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) excellent results, followed by bisphosphonates and conservative group (CG)

Further pooled results

Bone marrow edema (BME) resolution on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

1-3 months: bisphosphonates, iloprost and CD relatively the same; CG least promising
3-6 months: CD best, followed by ESWT, CG and bisphosphonates
6-12 months: ESWT best vs conservative, bisphosphonates and iloprost

Original publication

Comparison of various treatment modalities for the management of bone marrow edema syndrome/transient osteoporosis in men and non-pregnant women: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. Published 12 November 2022. doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06584-8

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.