Diabetes technology

Clinical outcomes of adults with type 1 diabetes and comorbid depression and/or anxiety disorders using hybrid closed‐loop: A retrospective study from a multidisciplinary tertiary centre

Diabetes Obes MetabPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

HCL users demonstrated improved HbA1c and TIR, compared with non-HCL users. These real-world data support safe use of HCL in people with type 1 diabetes and depression/anxiety in a multidisciplinary setting. Qualitative studies and prospective trials are required to further evaluate the impact of HCL on biomedical and mental health outcomes.

Study context

Population
Adults with T1D and comorbid depression and/or anxiety disorders, King's College Hospital diabetes centre, Oct 2023–Jan 2025; 163 female/63 male; median age 38 years; 196 depression, 119 anxietyof 1827 adults with T1D
Participants
226 adults
Exposure
Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) users vs non-HCL users
  • HCL usersn = 108
  • Non-HCL usersn = 118reference
Outcome
HbA1c and TIR
Follow-up
Last
Methodological detailssingle-centre, real-world
  • Single-centre
  • Real-world

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

last follow-up
GroupValueHaemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) %TIR
HCL users60.0 (IQR 53.0–66.0) mmol/mol7.6% (7.0-8.2)63.5 (55.8-75.0)
Non-HCL users73.0 (IQR 58.5–85.5) mmol/mol8.8% (7.5-10.0)42.0 (23.0-55.3)

Value

HCL users60.0 (IQR 53.0–66.0) mmol/mol
Non-HCL users73.0 (IQR 58.5–85.5) mmol/mol

Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) %

HCL users7.6% (7.0-8.2)
Non-HCL users8.8% (7.5-10.0)

TIR

HCL users63.5 (55.8-75.0)
Non-HCL users42.0 (23.0-55.3)
  • HCL users vs Non-HCL users: P < 0.001 — lower HbA1c with HCL users
  • HCL users vs Non-HCL users: P < 0.001 — higher TIR with HCL users

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Glycaemia post- vs pre-HCL initiation

P < 0.001

HbA1c % Post-HCL 7.6% (7.0-8.2) · Pre-HCL 8.3% (7.5-9.3)

TIR Post-HCL 63.5 (55.8-75.0) · Pre-HCL 39.0 (28.0-55.8)

OutcomeP value
Glycaemia post- vs pre-HCL initiationP < 0.001
Diabetes distress scale (DDS2) scores · lower post-HCL
P = 0.004
DDS2 scores · no difference
P = 0.230

Safety

OutcomeP value
Acute complicationsHCL users vs Non-HCL users · did not varyP = 0.380
Acute complicationsHCL users vs Non-HCL users · fewer HCL users experienced ketoacidosisP < 0.001

Original publication

Clinical outcomes of adults with type 1 diabetes and comorbid depression and/or anxiety disorders using hybrid closed‐loop: A retrospective study from a multidisciplinary tertiary centre. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 20 January 2026. doi:10.1111/dom.70432

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.