Type 2 & other diabetes

Cardiovascular Risks With SGLT2 Inhibitors in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

JAMA Netw OpenPublished Retrospective cohort study

Main finding · Total CVDResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 0.82 95% CI 0.69–0.98

Authors' conclusion

In this cohort study of patients with T2D, the use of SGLT2is vs DPP4is was associated with reduced total cardiovascular burden, suggesting that long-term use of this therapy may optimize treatment benefit among patients with chronic CVD. The SGLT2i-associated benefit among patients with high risk of CVD encourages the prioritization of SGLT2i use for these vulnerable individuals.

Study context

Population
Adults with T2D initiating first use of study drugs 2016–2019, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Taiwan; up to 6 years of follow-up
Participants
8,384 adults1,632 matched pairs
Exposure
SGLT2i vs DPP4i therapy
  • SGLT2in = 1,632
  • DPP4in = 1,632reference
Outcome
Total (first and subsequent) composite CVD events and individual CVD subtypes (AF, coronary heart disease, HF, stroke, MI, transient ischemic attack)
Methodological detailspropensity score-matched, single-centre electronic medical records, shared frailty model
  • Propensity score-matched
  • Single-centre electronic medical records
  • Shared frailty model

Main finding

Total CVD

Hazard ratio

0.82

95% CI 0.69–0.98

SGLT2ivs DPP4i
HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.69–0.98)

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Total CVD, eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²0.70 (0.62–0.80)
Total CVD, any diabetes-related complications0.70 (0.64–0.78)
Total CVD, history of CVD0.72 (0.65–0.80)
OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Total CVD, women with history of CVD0.59 (0.49–0.72)

Total cardiovascular disease (CVD), women with history of CVD

Greater reduction in total CVD burden with SGLT2i in women vs men at high CVD risk

Original publication

Cardiovascular Risks With SGLT2 Inhibitors in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. Published 1 October 2024. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41765

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.