Diabetes technology

Associations between daily step count classifications and continuous glucose monitoring metrics in adults with type 1 diabetes: analysis of the Type 1 Diabetes Exercise Initiative (T1DEXI) cohort

DiabetologiaPublished Observational cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Our results suggest that, compared with days with low step counts, days with higher step counts are associated with slight increases in both TIR and TBR, along with small reductions in total daily insulin requirements, in adults living with type 1 diabetes.

Study context

Population
Adults with T1D with available continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and step count data; mean±SD age 37±14 years; HbA1c 48.8±8.1 mmol/mol [6.6±0.7%]; 73% female; 45% HCL, 38% standard insulin pump, 17% MDI
Participants
464 adults
Exposure
Daily step count exceeding vs meeting vs below the step count goal
Outcome
CGM metrics incl. TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/l), TBR (<3.9 mmol/l) and TAR (>10.0 mmol/l)
Follow-up
4 week period
Methodological detailsanalysis of the T1DEXI cohort, 4 week free-living observational study, between- and within-participant analyses
  • Analysis of the T1DEXI cohort
  • 4 week free-living observational study
  • Between- and within-participant analyses

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

TIR, between-participant analysis

P > 0.05

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/l), within-participant comparison by day · 4 week period — Exceeding vs Below · higher on days goal exceeded · within-participant comparisons

P < 0.001

Total daily insulin dose, within-participant comparison by day · 4 week period — Exceeding vs Below · lower on days goal exceeded · within-participant comparisons

P < 0.001

OutcomeDifference in means (%)P value
TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/l), within-participant comparison by day · 4 week periodMeeting vs Below · higher on days goal met · within-participant comparisonsP < 0.001
TBR (<3.9 mmol/l), within-participant comparison by day · 4 week periodBelow vs Exceeding · TBR higher on days goal exceeded · within-participant comparisons−0.4P = 0.001
Total daily insulin dose, within-participant comparison by day · 4 week periodMeeting vs Below · lower on days goal met · within-participant comparisonsP < 0.001

CGM metrics, subgroup baseline HbA1c ≥53 mmol/mol (≥7.0%)

Step count had a larger effect on CGM-based metrics in participants with baseline HbA1c ≥53 mmol/mol (≥7.0%)

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Associations between daily step count classifications and continuous glucose monitoring metrics in adults with type 1 diabetes: analysis of the Type 1 Diabetes Exercise Initiative (T1DEXI) cohort. Diabetologia. Published 19 March 2024. doi:10.1007/s00125-024-06127-2

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.