Type 2 & other diabetes

Association of relative fat mass with the incidence of type 2 diabetes: over a decade follow-up from the TLGS

Int J Obes (Lond)Published Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

While RFM is strongly associated with the risk of T2DM, particularly in women and younger individuals, it does not outperform WC.

Study context

Population
Adults in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study cohort; 4716 women; mean age 40.52 years
Participants
8,419 adults
Exposure
Per SD increase in relative fat mass (RFM)
Outcome
Incident T2D
Follow-up
Median 14 years
Methodological detailspopulation-based cohort (Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study)
  • Population-based cohort (Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Incident T2D per SD increase in RFM (multivariable-adjusted)
Hazard ratio (CI)P value
Men: per SD increase in RFM
1.26(1.02–1.57)
P = 0.037
Women: per SD increase in RFM
1.52(1.27–1.81)
P < 0.001

Per SD increase in RFM, as printed

Developed T2D
1382 (16.42%)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeP value
RFM vs WC for T2D riskComparable in men and womenP for difference > 0.05

Baseline insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and its components

RFM significantly associated with insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and its components in both men and women

Subgroups and sensitivity analyses

Associations stronger in younger individuals
Remained significant only in women after adjusting for insulin resistance and restricting to normoglycemic individuals

Original publication

Association of relative fat mass with the incidence of type 2 diabetes: over a decade follow-up from the TLGS. Int J Obes (Lond). Published 8 September 2025. doi:10.1038/s41366-025-01858-7

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.