Type 2 & other diabetes

Relationship between time-varying achieved HbA1c and risk of coronary artery disease events among common haptoglobin phenotype groups with type 2 diabetes: the ADVANCE study

BMJ Open Diabetes Res CarePublished Secondary analysis of the ADVANCE randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

The present ADVANCE analysis suggests that not having HbA1c ≥8.0%, rather than achieving HbA1c <7.0%, was found to be particularly important for CAD prevention among people with type 2 diabetes and the common Hp2-2 phenotype. While the subgroup analyses were likely underpowered, their inclusion is hypothesis generating and can be used in future meta-analyses to improve power and generalizability.

Study context

Population
People with T2D in the ADVANCE biomarker case-cohort study
Participants
1,323 vs 2,069
Comparison
Time-varying achieved HbA1c <7.0% and ≥8.0% vs 7.0%-7.9%, by haptoglobin (Hp) phenotype
  • Hp2-2n = 1,323
  • non-Hp2-2n = 2,069
Primary endpoint
Incident CAD by achieved HbA1c (<7.0% or ≥8.0% vs 7.0%-7.9%), by Hp phenotype
Follow-up
Median 5.0 (IQR 4.5-5.3) years
Methodological detailscase-cohort, weighted multivariable-adjusted Cox regression, a priori stratifications by sex, race, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) and T2D duration
  • Case-cohort
  • Weighted multivariable-adjusted Cox regression
  • A priori stratifications by sex, race, previous CVD and T2D duration

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

CAD risk, HbA1c ≥8.0% vs 7.0%-7.9%, by Hp phenotype
GroupHR95% CICI
Hp2-21.531.01 to 2.32
non-Hp2-21.260.89 to 1.77

HR

Hp2-21.53
non-Hp2-21.26

95% CI

Hp2-21.01 to 2.32
non-Hp2-2— not stated in the abstract

CI

Hp2-2— not stated in the abstract
non-Hp2-20.89 to 1.77
  • Hp2-2 vs non-Hp2-2: P for interaction = 0.71

Further findings

CAD risk, HbA1c ≥8.0% vs <8.0%

P for interaction = 0.97

HR Hp2-2 1.59 · non-Hp2-2 1.39

CI Hp2-2 1.12 to 2.26 · non-Hp2-2 1.03 to 1.88

Higher CAD risk

OutcomeHp2-2non-Hp2-2P value
CAD risk, HbA1c ≥8.0% vs 7.0%-7.9%, excluding previous CVD at baselineP for interaction = 0.03
HR2.80— not stated in the abstract
CI1.41 to 5.53— not stated in the abstract

— not stated in the abstract

Mean HbA1c

Mean HbA1c was similar in each phenotype group throughout the study

Original publication

Relationship between time-varying achieved HbA1c and risk of coronary artery disease events among common haptoglobin phenotype groups with type 2 diabetes: the ADVANCE study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. Published 6 May 2025. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004713

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.