Virtual Weight Management and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Primary result · Change in HbA1c%Result — go to the resultDifference −0.46% CI −0.89% to −0.03%Authors' conclusion
Integrating CGM with a digital weight management program produced significantly greater improvements in HbA1c%, body weight, and other glucose metrics compared to UC among adults with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes.
Study context
- Population
- Adults with overweight or obesity and T2D
- Participants
- 151 adults
- Comparison
- Behavioral weight management with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) vs usual care
- Intervention (INT)n = 75
- Usual care (UC)n = 76reference
- Primary endpoint
- Change in HbA1c%
- Follow-up
- 6 months
Methodological detailstwo-arm, parallel
- Two-arm
- Parallel
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Difference
−0.46%
CI −0.89% to −0.03%
P = 0.037
Change by group
INT
−0.87%
95% CI −1.17%–-0.57%
UC
−0.41%
CI −0.72%–-0.10%
INTvs UC
difference −0.46% (CI −0.89% to −0.03%); P = 0.037
Further findings
| Outcome | Difference (CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percent body weight changeGreater reductions with INT | −3.2% (−4.9% to −1.5%) | P < 0.001 | |
| −6−4−202Difference (linear scale) |
CGM metrics, diabetes treatment satisfaction and regimen-related diabetes stress
- Several CGM metrics improved significantly more in INT than UC
- Significantly greater improvements in diabetes treatment satisfaction and regimen-related diabetes stress with INT vs UC
Original publication
Virtual Weight Management and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). Published 28 April 2026. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →