Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

Variation in bone mineral density and fractures over 20 years among Canadians: a comparison of the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study and the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

Osteoporos IntPublished Comparative cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Higher BMD and lower fracture prevalence were noted in the more recently recruited CLSA cohort compared to CaMos, even after adjusting for multiple covariates.

Study context

Population
Canadian men and women aged 50–85 years
Participants
6,479 vs 19,534
Exposure
Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) vs Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)
  • CaMosn = 6,479
  • CLSAn = 19,534reference
Outcome
Sex-specific FN-BMD and prevalent major osteoporotic fractures (MOF)
Methodological detailstwo cohorts recruited 20 years apart, adjusted linear and logistic regression
  • Two cohorts recruited 20 years apart
  • Adjusted linear and logistic regression

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

CaMos vs CLSAEstimate (95% CI)
Women
aOR for prevalent MOF, women 1.99(1.71–2.30)
Men
aOR for prevalent MOF, men 2.33(1.82–3.00)
Women
adjusted difference in femoral neck bone mineral density (FN-BMD), women - 0.017 g/cm² (95% CI - 0.021; - 0.014)
Men
adjusted difference in FN-BMD, men - 0.006 g/cm² (95% CI - 0.011; 0.000)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Age at baseline

Menopausal hormone therapy use, women with prevalent MOF · similar in both cohorts

P = 0.076

Supplement use, women with prevalent MOF

P < 0.001

Bisphosphonate use, women with prevalent MOF

P < 0.001

Baseline BMI and smoking · CaMos: lower mean BMI and higher smoking prevalence
P < 0.001

Bisphosphonate use, men with major osteoporotic fractures (MOF)

Below 10% in both cohorts

Original publication

Variation in bone mineral density and fractures over 20 years among Canadians: a comparison of the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study and the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Osteoporos Int. Published 30 November 2022. doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06623-4

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.