Type 1 diabetes

Validating and Establishing a Diagnostic Threshold for the Hypoglycemia Awareness Questionnaire Impaired Awareness Subscale

Endocr PractPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

These findings support the validity of the HypoA-Q IA subscale and propose a HypoA-Q IA diagnostic threshold to identify IAH in both clinical and research settings.

Study context

Population
Adults with T1D (male, 48%; median age, 36 years; T1D duration, 21 years); those with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) (Clarke score ≥4) and severely problematic hypoglycemia and/or marked glycemic lability started AID10 with IAH
Participants
21 adults
Outcome
Discriminant and convergent validity of the HypoA-Q IA subscale and a diagnostic threshold for IAH classification
Methodological detailsvalidation study, within 18-month intervention study, hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp
  • Validation study
  • Within 18-month intervention study
  • Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Prediction of abnormal symptom response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia (ROC analysis)
Test or modelAUCOptimal thresholdSensitivitySpecificity
HypoA-Q IA subscale0.861283%80%

HypoA-Q IA subscale

AUC0.86
Optimal threshold12
Sensitivity83%
Specificity80%
Discriminated between those with and without IAH defined by Clarke score (W = 110.5)
P < 0.001

Further findings

Convergent validity during intervention: correlations with HypoA-Q IA subscale

Clarke score
r = 0.72; P <.001
HYPO score
r = 0.60; P <.001
Hypoglycemia exposure <70 mg/dL
r = 0.53; P <.01
Hypoglycemia exposure <60 mg/dL
r = 0.50; P <.01
Hypoglycemia exposure <54 mg/dL
r = 0.48; P <.01
Autonomic symptom response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia
r = −0.53; P <.05
Epinephrine response
r = −0.68; P <.001
Pancreatic polypeptide response
r = −0.52; P <.05

Original publication

Validating and Establishing a Diagnostic Threshold for the Hypoglycemia Awareness Questionnaire Impaired Awareness Subscale. Endocr Pract. Published 21 August 2023. doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2023.08.004

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.