Diabetes technology

Use of an insulin titration protocol based on continuous glucose monitoring in postoperative cardiac surgery patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Cardiovasc DiabetolPublished Randomised controlled trial

An erratum to this article was published (Cardiovasc Diabetol, 13 Sep 2025 ↗)

Authors' conclusion

While the primary outcome was not achieved, CGM with a specialized titration protocol demonstrated safe glycemic control with improvements in TIR 70-180 mg/dL and TITRs in cardiac surgery patients with T2D and prediabetes. The observed reduction in postoperative AF warrants further investigation.

Study context

Population
Cardiac surgery patients with T2D or prediabetes, randomized one day post-surgery; 31 (59.6%) had diabetes and 21 (40.4%) prediabetesrandomized one day post-surgery
Participants
54 patients
Comparison
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with a CGM-specialized insulin titration protocol vs point-of-care (POC) glucose monitoring
  • CGMn = 27
  • POCn = 25reference
Primary endpoint
TIR 100-180 mg/dL
Follow-up
7 days post-surgery
Methodological detailsMultiple comparison adjustment by false-discovery-rate (FDR)
  • Multiple comparison adjustment by false-discovery-rate (FDR)

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

  • Time-in-range (TIR) 100-180 mg/dL showed no difference
  • CGM vs POC: FDR-adjusted p = 0.376
  • Primary outcome not achieved

Secondary outcomes

TIR 70-180 mg/dL

FDR-adjusted p = 0.026

Time in tight range (TITR) 100-140 mg/dL

FDR-adjusted p = 0.018

TITR 70-140 mg/dL

FDR-adjusted p = 0.003

Postoperative AF · lower with CGM

FDR-adjusted p = 0.04999

Safety

OutcomeP value
TBR (<70 mg/dL)FDR-adjusted p = 0.109

TBR (<70 mg/dL)

Both groups maintained very low rates of time below range

Original publication

Use of an insulin titration protocol based on continuous glucose monitoring in postoperative cardiac surgery patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. Published 14 May 2025. doi:10.1186/s12933-025-02747-z

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.