Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

The yield of routine laboratory examination in osteoporosis evaluation in primary care

Osteoporos IntPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

We identified a low prevalence of laboratory abnormalities in a primary care population of older women and the majority of these findings had no medical consequences.

Study context

Population
Women ≥ 65 years of age participating in a primary care fracture risk screening study2,208 in follow-up sample
Participants
8,996 women
Outcome
Prevalence of laboratory abnormalities and their association with fracture risk factors, recent fractures, low BMD and prevalent vertebral fracture
Methodological detailsprimary care fracture risk screening study, follow-up of medical records in a sample (≥ 1 year)
  • Primary care fracture risk screening study
  • Follow-up of medical records in a sample (≥ 1 year)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Prevalence of laboratory abnormalities
Vitamin D deficiency (< 30 nmol/L)
13%
Vitamin D insufficiency (< 50 nmol/L)
43%
Other abnormalities (ESR, calcium, creatinine, FT4), women with risk factors for fractures
4.6%
Other abnormalities, low bone mineral density (BMD) (T-score ≤ - 2.5)
6.1%
Other abnormalities, after prevalent vertebral fracture
6.0%
Other abnormalities, after recent fracture
5.2%
Other abnormalities, absence of important risk factors
2.6%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Association of laboratory abnormalities other than vitamin D with low BMD

OR
1.4 (95%CI 1.1-1.8)
Not associated with prevalent vertebral fractures nor recent fractures

Associations of low BMD

Renal failure, OR
2.0 (95%CI 1.3-3.4)
Vitamin D insufficiency, OR
1.2 (95%CI 1.0-1.3)
Vitamin D deficiency, OR
1.3 (95%CI 1.1-.5)

Laboratory abnormalities without new diagnosis or treatment in medical records · follow-up ≥ 1 year

No medical consequence
82%

Original publication

The yield of routine laboratory examination in osteoporosis evaluation in primary care. Osteoporos Int. Published 18 March 2024. doi:10.1007/s00198-024-07042-3

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.