Obesity

Risk factors for metabolic syndrome in self‐identified and questioning sexual minority women

Obesity (Silver Spring)Published Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

Self-identified and questioning SMW did not have an increased incidence of MetS compared with heterosexual women, but they had higher odds of large waist circumference and low high-density lipoprotein, respectively. Further studies are needed to identify the gaps in social determinants of health in SMW.

Study context

Population
Women aged 20 to 59 years, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001–2016
Participants
12,755 women
Exposure
Self-identified sexual minority women (SMW) and questioning SMW vs heterosexual women
  • Self-identified SMWn = 708
  • Questioning SMWn = 365
Outcome
MetS and its components
Methodological detailsNHANES 2001–2016, logistic regression
  • NHANES 2001–2016
  • Logistic regression

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Incidence of MetS
  • Incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) not significantly different across the groups

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeOR (95% CI)
Large waist circumferenceSelf-identified SMWvs Heterosexual1.39 (1.14–1.71)
ObesitySelf-identified SMWvs Heterosexual1.53 (1.24–1.90)
Low HDLQuestioning SMWvs Heterosexual1.5 (1.13–1.98)

Original publication

Risk factors for metabolic syndrome in self‐identified and questioning sexual minority women. Obesity (Silver Spring). Published 18 September 2023. doi:10.1002/oby.23879

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.