Diabetes technology

Reliability of Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM): Comparison to Standard of Care

J Diabetes Sci TechnolPublished Method comparison study

Authors' conclusion

These results suggest that the use of inpatient CGM arrives at similar correction insulin dosing. The routine use of CGM for inpatients would consistently underestimate the BG compared with POC BG and could aid in minimizing and predicting hypoglycemia in the hospital setting. Our data support that the model of adoption of real-time inpatient CGM technology is anticipated to have significant impact in the clinical setting in efforts to maintain adequate glycemic control targeting BG 140-180 mg/dL while minimizing the frequency of hypoglycemic events.

Study context

Population
Hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia/diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with basal bolus insulin or intravenous insulin (IVI)
Participants
20 vs 16
Comparison
Inpatient CGM vs standard point of care (POC) blood glucose (BG) measurements
  • BBTn = 20
  • IVIn = 16
Outcome
Comparability of CGM vs POC BG (mean absolute relative difference)
Methodological detailsblinded (professional) CGM, CGM data not available in real time
  • Blinded (professional) CGM
  • CGM data not available in real time

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Mean absolute relative difference, CGM vs POC BG

Mean absolute relative difference, CGM vs POC BG BBT mean 24.6% (SD 8.1) · IVI mean 19.6% (SD 9.4)

Median

  • Between IVI and BBT: P = 0.10 — means not different (Wilcoxon two-sample test)
  • Between IVI and BBT: P = 0.015 — medians different (Wilcoxon two-sample test)
Overall mean absolute relative difference (both groups)
22.3% (SD, 9.0); median 20.0%

Further findings

CGM minus POC BG (CGM lower in majority of paired values)

CGM minus POC BG (CGM lower in majority of paired values) — Agreement of glucose results (Bland-Altman)
83%

Correction insulin dose, CGM vs POC BG

Absolute difference in insulin dose, BBT (1142 paired values)
1.34 units
Absolute difference in insulin dose, IVI (300 paired values)
0.74 units

Earlier hypoglycemia detection by CGM vs POC BG

Average lead time of CGM detection
3 hours and 34 minutes
Lead time in severe nocturnal hypoglycemia (POC BG <54 mg/dL)
up to 3 hours and 42 minutes
  • If used in real time

Safety

BBT patients with hypoglycemic event (POC BG <70 mg/dL)
About a third
Severe nocturnal hypoglycemia (POC BG <54 mg/dL)
2 participants

Original publication

Reliability of Inpatient CGM: Comparison to Standard of Care. J Diabetes Sci Technol. Published 15 December 2021. doi:10.1177/19322968211062168

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.