Relationship between triglyceride-glucose index and stroke risk in middle-aged and older Chinese population: a national longitudinal study based on explainable machine learning

Diabetes Res Clin PractPublished Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

This research employs explainable machine learning to delineate factors that contribute to stroke risk, highlighting how the TyG index's impact on stroke risk varies by age and gender. As an established surrogate marker for insulin resistance, the TyG index monitoring may play a crucial role in stroke prevention and management strategies.

Study context

Population
Middle-aged and older adults without history of stroke at baseline, China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)
Participants
6,863 participants
Exposure
Quartiles of baseline triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index
Outcome
Incident first stroke
Follow-up
9-year follow-up
Methodological detailsnational longitudinal, explainable machine learning, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) Cox regression, multivariate Cox proportional hazards model
  • National longitudinal
  • Explainable machine learning
  • Lasso Cox regression
  • Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Stroke risk
Adjusted hazard ratio (95 % CI)P value
Q2vs Q1
1.45(1.16–1.82)
P < 0.01
Q3vs Q1
1.64(1.31–2.04)
P < 0.01
Q4vs Q1
1.36(1.08–1.72)
P < 0.01

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Incidence of first stroke (all participants) · 9-year follow-up

Participants with a first stroke
787 (11.5 %)

Subgroups by age and gender

Associations consistent across all subgroups except age <60 years

Predictor importance (explainable machine learning)

Age the most significant predictor of stroke risk; TyG index a relatively important factor

Original publication

Relationship between triglyceride-glucose index and stroke risk in middle-aged and older Chinese population: a national longitudinal study based on explainable machine learning. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Published 7 August 2025. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112414

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.