Randomized non-inferiority trial comparing an asynchronous remotely-delivered versus clinic-delivered lifestyle intervention
Authors' conclusion
Results revealed a remotely-delivered asynchronous lifestyle intervention resulted in slightly less weight loss than an in-person version but may be more economical and convenient.
Study context
- Participants
- 329 participants
- Comparison
- Remotely delivered asynchronous lifestyle intervention via online social network (Get Social) vs in-person group lifestyle intervention (Traditional)
- Primary endpoint
- Mean percent weight loss (non-inferiority of Get Social vs Traditional)
- Follow-up
- 12 months
Methodological detailsnon-inferiority
- Non-inferiority
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Percent weight change
Get Social
2.7%
Traditional
3.7%
P = 0.17
Further findings
Intervention delivery cost per pound lost
Participation rated as convenient
P = 0.001
Original publication
Randomized non-inferiority trial comparing an asynchronous remotely-delivered versus clinic-delivered lifestyle intervention. Int J Obes (Lond). Published 27 August 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →