A quantitative process evaluation of a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a co‐designed cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for people with type 1 diabetes and disordered eating (steady trial): Auditing treatment integrity and delivery
Authors' conclusion
When scaling up for a multi-site RCT, some participants may need greater flexibility regarding timing to access all STEADY sessions. STEADY can be personalised through its toolkit-based approach, and therapists should be mindful and trained in the range of tools available.
Study context
- Population
- People with T1D and mild-to-moderate disordered eating (T1DE)
Methodological detailsSTEADY, feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), complex psychological intervention
- STEADY
- Feasibility RCT
- Complex psychological intervention
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Treatment integrity and delivery
- Most frequent tool: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) formulation
- 72 uses
- Behavioural experiments
- 47 uses
- Thought records
- 43 uses
- Goal setting
- 40 uses
- Understanding emotions and 'riding the wave'
- 40 uses
- CTS-R mean score (competent adherence to CBT; minimum competency ≥3)
- 3.81 ± 0.74
- Mean time to completion
- 153.3 days (SD = 73)
Original publication
A quantitative process evaluation of a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a co‐designed cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for people with type 1 diabetes and disordered eating (steady trial): Auditing treatment integrity and delivery. Diabet Med. Published 12 September 2025. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →