Type 2 & other diabetes

Predictive models of post‐prandial glucose response in persons with prediabetes and early onset type 2 diabetes: A pilot study

Diabetes Obes MetabPublished Pilot study

Authors' conclusion

These data support a CGM-guided personalized nutrition and medicine approach to control PPGR in older individuals with prediabetes and diet and/or metformin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Study context

Population
Older adults (age 60 ± 7, BMI 33.0 ± 6.6 kg/m²) with prediabetes or early onset T2D
Participants
35 vs 3
Comparison
Prediabetes vs Early onset T2D
  • Prediabetesn = 35
  • Early onset T2Dn = 3
Outcome
Predictive value of habitual CGM glucose excursions and fasting glucose on post-prandial glucose response (PPGR) after a research meal (MEAL-PPGR) and during an OGTT (OGTT-PPGR)
Methodological detailsfree-living conditions, continuous glucose monitor (CGM) over 2 weeks, actigraphy
  • Free-living conditions
  • CGM over 2 weeks
  • Actigraphy

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Prediction of PPGR

Mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE) and fasting glucose predicting all measures of OGTT-PPGR (AUC, peak, delta, mean glucose, glucose at 120 min), R2

between 0.616 and 0.786

Adding Matsuda index, HOMA-B and HOMA-IR to fasting glucose and MAGE, R2

0.651 to 0.832

MAGE and premeal glucose predicting MEAL-PPGR, R2

0.546 to 0.722

Adding meal carbohydrates to prediction of 3 h AUC, R2 increase

from 0.723 to 0.761

Original publication

Predictive models of post‐prandial glucose response in persons with prediabetes and early onset type 2 diabetes: A pilot study. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 2 January 2025. doi:10.1111/dom.16160

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.