Diabetes technology

Performance of a Novel Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device in People With Diabetes

J Diabetes Sci TechnolPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

The system showed a good performance compared to capillary BG measurements. This level of accuracy could be shown over the entire measurement range, especially in the low glycemic range, and the whole wear time of the sensors. The results of this study are supporting a non-adjunctive use of the device.

Study context

Population
Adults with diabetes139 sensors analysed
Participants
48 adults
Comparison
Novel continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system vs capillary blood glucose (BG)
Outcome
20/20 agreement rate: % of CGM readings within ±20 mg/dL (BG <100 mg/dL) or ±20% (BG ≥100 mg/dL) of the comparator
Methodological detailsmulticentre
  • Multicentre

Performance

As reported in the abstract

20/20 AR vs capillary BG (in-clinic sessions) · up to 14 days

20/20 agreement rate (AR) during in-clinic sessions

90.5%

Further findings

Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) (in-clinic sessions)

MARD during in-clinic sessions
9.2%

20/20 AR by BG range

BG <70 mg/dL
94.3%
BG 70-180 mg/dL
89.0%
BG >180 mg/dL
92.5%

20/20 AR across sensor wear time

Beginning of wear time
92.8%
Middle of wear time
91.5%
End of wear time
85.9%

Sensor survival · up to 14 days

14-day survival probability
82.4%

Safety

Pain and bleeding after sensor insertion were within the expected range; use of the device regarded as safe

Original publication

Performance of a Novel Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device in People With Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. Published 19 August 2024. doi:10.1177/19322968241267774

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.