Endocrine oncology

Pancreatic imaging in MEN1—comparison of conventional and somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in real-life setting

Eur J EndocrinolPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

SSTR PET/CT demonstrates high accuracy in the detection of panNETs and alters the clinical management in nearly half of the MEN1-patients. SSTR PET/CT enables timely diagnosis and staging of MEN1-related panNETs.

Study context

Population
Patients with MEN1, median age 40 (range 16–72) years; SSTR PET/CT as screening regardless of disease stage or to characterise known pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs)or to characterise known panNETs 11
Participants
58 patients
Comparison
SSTR PET/CT vs conventional imaging
Outcome
panNET detection
Methodological detailsreal-life setting, blinded analysis, Median follow-up 47 months
  • Real-life setting
  • Blinded analysis
  • Median follow-up 47 months

Performance

As reported in the abstract

  • SSTR PET/CT detected three times as many panNETs as conventional imaging
  • SSTR PET/CT vs Conventional imaging: P < 0.001

Further findings

panNET or recurrence identified in patients with no previous panNET (n = 22) or in remission after surgery (n = 3) — SSTR PET/CT
60%
Management altered by SSTR PET/CT
47% · 27 events
Management altered by SSTR PET/CT — Referred for surgery
7 (12%)
Management altered by SSTR PET/CT — Received systemic treatment
5 (9%)
panNET or recurrence identified in patients with no previous panNET (n = 22) or in remission after surgery (n = 3) — panNET identified
14
panNET or recurrence identified in patients with no previous panNET (n = 22) or in remission after surgery (n = 3) — Recurrence identified
1
  • panNET or recurrence identified in patients with no previous panNET (n = 22) or in remission after surgery (n = 3): 15/25

panNET on SSTR PET/CT not immediately visible on conventional imaging · median follow-up 47 months

Patients with panNET revealed only by SSTR PET/CT
8
Became visible on conventional imaging during follow-up
3
Required intervention
0

panNETs on conventional imaging after negative SSTR PET/CT · 38 months of follow-up

No panNETs identified on conventional imaging when SSTR PET/CT was negative

Original publication

Pancreatic imaging in MEN1—comparison of conventional and somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in real-life setting. Eur J Endocrinol. Published 21 March 2023. doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvad035

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.