One‐Year Weight Loss Following a Remote Culinary Medicine Program: A Bi‐Center Randomized Controlled Trial
Primary result · Weight changeResult — go to the resultNet difference −4.30 % CI −0.69% to −7.92%Authors' conclusion
CM can be an effective strategy to promote weight and body fat loss.
Study context
- Population
- Adults aged 25–70 with BMI 27.5–35 kg/m²modified ITT analysis
- Participants
- 50 adults
- Comparison
- Culinary medicine (CM) intervention vs control
- Primary endpoint
- Body weight
- Follow-up
- 0, 3, 6 and 12 months
Methodological detailsbi-center, remote culinary medicine program
- Bi-center
- Remote culinary medicine program
Primary result
Weight change · 12 months
Net difference
−4.30 %
CI −0.69% to −7.92%
P = 0.021
Change by group
Intervention
−4.02%
mean · unlabelled (in parentheses) 6.24%
As reported in the abstract
Further findings
| Outcome | Intervention | Net difference (CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mediterranean diet score improvement · 3 months | 2 points | 1.62 (0.263–2.968) | P = 0.020 | |
| Calorie consumption decrease · 6 months | 452 cal | −390 (−701.1 to −78.13) | P = 0.015 | |
| −1000−5000500Difference (linear scale) |
| Outcome | Intervention | Net difference (%) (CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight change · 3 months | mean −3.23% (unlabelled (in parentheses) 3.52%) | −2.52 (−0.48% to −4.56%) | P = 0.016 |
| Weight change · 6 months | mean −4.2% (unlabelled (in parentheses) 5.24%) | −2.98 (−0.36% to −5.60%) | P = 0.027 |
| Fat mass loss · 6 months | 1.86% (unlabelled (in parentheses) 1.54%) | 1.96 (−3.82% to 0.11%) | P = 0.039 |
Original publication
One‐Year Weight Loss Following a Remote Culinary Medicine Program: A Bi‐Center Randomized Controlled Trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). Published 7 April 2026. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →