Multicenter Evaluation Study Comparing a New Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to Existing Flash Glucose Monitoring System
Study context
- Population
- Participants wearing 4 study sensors with one in-clinic visit for venous blood reference tests
- Participants
- 120 vs 40
- Comparison
- AiDEX CGM vs Abbott Libre flash glucose monitoring
- AiDEXn = 120
- Abbott Libren = 40reference
- Outcome
- Accurate readings vs venous blood glucose (continuous glucose error grid analysis (CG-EGA))
Methodological detailsmulticenter, prospective, masked
- Multicenter
- Prospective
- Masked
Performance
As reported in the abstract
Further findings
- Overall MARD of AiDEX
- 9.08% · MARD vs venous blood reference · MARD vs finger capillary BG reference 10.1%
Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.
Original publication
Multicenter Evaluation Study Comparing a New Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to Existing Flash Glucose Monitoring System. J Diabetes Sci Technol. Published 11 August 2021. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →