Microvascular endothelial dysfunction in skin is associated with higher risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in women with type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn Diabetes Care System Cohort
Authors' conclusion
Impaired microvascular responses to insulin and acetylcholine in skin confers a higher risk of HFpEF in women with type 2 diabetes. In vivo measures of systemic MVD could represent novel risk markers for HFpEF, opening new avenues for the prevention of HFpEF in type 2 diabetes.
Study context
- Population
- Adults with T2D from the Hoorn Diabetes Care System Cohort; mean age 67 ± 6y, mean HbA1c 7.6 ± 1.3%50% women
- Participants
- 154 adults
- Exposure
- Skin microvascular perfusion responses to insulin, acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) vs left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) markers and H2FPEF score
- Outcome
- Association of skin MVD (perfusion responses) with echocardiographic and clinical markers of LVDD and the H2FPEF score
Methodological detailscross-sectional analysis within a prospective cohort, multivariable linear regression adjusted for confounders, stratified by sex, microvascular dysfunction (MVD) assessed by laser speckle contrast analysis with iontophoresis of insulin, acetylcholine and SNP
- Cross-sectional analysis within a prospective cohort
- Multivariable linear regression adjusted for confounders
- Stratified by sex
- MVD assessed by laser speckle contrast analysis with iontophoresis of insulin, acetylcholine and SNP
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Women: insulin response, increase of H2FPEF score
5.8%
95% CI 2.3;9.4%
Women: acetylcholine response, increase of H2FPEF score
5.9%
95% CI 1.7;10.1%
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
Events
| Outcome | Women | Men |
|---|---|---|
| HFpEF diagnosis | 11 | 3 |
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) diagnosis
- Patients with HFpEF showed lower perfusion response to insulin than those without HFpEF
Sex differences in clinical characteristics
- Obesity, women vs men
- 54.5 vs. 35.1%
- NT-proBNP (pg/ml), women vs men
- 80, IQR:34-165 vs. 46, 27-117
- E/E', women vs men
- 13.3 ± 4.3 vs. 11.4 ± 3.0
Other echocardiographic markers
- Lower SNP response associated with higher pulmonary arterial systolic pressure in men
- Lower acetylcholine response associated with higher LV mass index in women and worse LV longitudinal strain in total population
- No significant associations between perfusion responses and conventional LVDD markers
Original publication
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →