Type 2 & other diabetes

Menopause hormone therapy and type 2 diabetes risk and prognosis: systematic review and meta-analyses

DiabetologiaPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies

Authors' conclusion

MHT showed small beneficial associations with glucose metabolism among women with and without type 2 diabetes, while the effect size was generally too small to be clinically significant.

Study context

Population
Postmenopausal women or women undergoing the menopausal transition, with or without T2D; 15 countries49 articles (33 RCTs, 16 cohort)
Participants
1,472,277 women
Comparison
Menopause hormone therapy (MHT) users vs non-users
Outcome
Women without T2D: glucose metabolism and new-onset T2D
Methodological detailsrandom-effects models, RoB 2 and ROBINS-I risk of bias, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) certainty of evidence, Seven studies at low risk of bias
  • Random-effects models
  • RoB 2 and ROBINS-I risk of bias
  • GRADE certainty of evidence
  • Seven studies at low risk of bias

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

MHT vs Non-MHTRR new-onset T2D (95% CI)
14 studies, N=1,450,134; very low CoE
0.83(0.75–0.92)
11 studies, N=4262; high certainty of evidence (CoE)
MD fasting insulin −5.90 pmol/l (95% CI −8.03 to −3.77)
4 studies, N=2883; moderate CoE
MD HOMA-IR −0.21 (95% CI −0.32 to −0.09)

Further pooled results

OutcomeEstimate
Women with T2D: glycaemia, lipids and BPMHT vs Non-MHT · 16 studies, N=1379; very low CoEMD FPG −1.07 mmol/l (95% CI −1.86 to −0.28)
Women with T2D: glycaemia, lipids and BPMHT vs Non-MHT · 17 studies, N=15,720; −0.50% (−0.76, −0.24%); very low CoEMD HbA1c −5.47 mmol/mol (95% CI −8.32 to −2.62)
Women with T2D: glycaemia, lipids and BPMHT vs Non-MHT · 15 studies, N=907; low CoEMD cholesterol −0.37 mmol/l (95% CI −0.50 to −0.24)
Women with T2D: glycaemia, lipids and BPMHT vs Non-MHT · 16 studies, N=961; low CoEMD LDL-C −0.33 mmol/l (95% CI −0.54 to −0.13)
Women with T2D: glycaemia, lipids and BPMHT vs Non-MHT · 9 studies, N=630; −0.46 kPa; low CoEMD systolic BP −3.43 mmHg (95% CI −4.88 to −1.98)

Original publication

Menopause hormone therapy and type 2 diabetes risk and prognosis: systematic review and meta-analyses. Diabetologia. Published 18 September 2026. doi:10.1007/s00125-026-06856-6

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.