Obesity

Handgrip Strength and Trajectories of Preclinical Obesity Progression: A Multistate Model Analysis Using the UK Biobank

J Clin Endocrinol MetabPublished Prospective cohort study

Main finding · Preclinical obesity progression: baseline to first dysfunction (strongest association)Result — go to the resultHazard ratio 0.86 95% CI 0.85–0.88

Authors' conclusion

Increased grip strength was significantly associated with a decreased risk of obesity-induced dysfunctions progression and multiple-cause mortality. These findings underscore the importance of improving muscle mass and strength in preclinical obesity.

Study context

Population
UK Biobank participants with preclinical obesity (elevated BMI plus ≥1 abnormal waist circumference, WHR, waist-to-height ratio or % body fat, without obesity-induced dysfunctions)8,163 deaths
Participants
93,275 participants
Exposure
Higher vs lower grip strength
Outcome
Preclinical obesity progression (baseline to dysfunctions and death) and multiple-cause mortality
Follow-up
Mean 13.4 years
Methodological detailsmultistate model, UK Biobank
  • Multistate model
  • UK Biobank

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Preclinical obesity progression: baseline to first dysfunction (strongest association)

Hazard ratio

0.86

95% CI 0.85–0.88

Per SD increase in grip strength
HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.85–0.88)

Per SD increase in grip strength, as printed

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)
Double dysfunctions to all-cause death (most pronounced association)Highest tertilevs Lowest tertileFully adjusted0.77 (0.70–0.84)

Double dysfunctions to all-cause death (most pronounced association)

Highest vs lowest tertile protective across all trajectory models

Subgroup and sensitivity analyses (free muscle volume, total lean mass, muscle-to-weight ratio)

Consistent results

Original publication

Handgrip Strength and Trajectories of Preclinical Obesity Progression: A Multistate Model Analysis Using the UK Biobank. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Published 15 October 2025. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf521

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.