Obesity

Evaluating a large language model for identifying key comorbidities in discharge summaries of patients with obesity: a comparative validation study against ICD codes using MIMIC-IV

Int J Obes (Lond)Published Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

The LLM showed promising concordance with ICD codes for T2DM, HTN, OSA, and HLD in obesity patient discharge summaries.

Study context

Population
Discharge summaries of adult patients with obesity, MIMIC-IV; mean age 59.7 years, 60.4% female341 unique patients
Participants
350 admissions
Comparison
LLM identification of comorbidities vs ICD codes and manual review
Outcome
Performance (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score) of LLM vs ICD codes for T2D, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and obstructive sleep apnoea
Methodological detailsretrospective, validation study, MIMIC-IV data
  • Retrospective
  • Validation study
  • MIMIC-IV data

Performance

As reported in the abstract

F1-score of LLM vs ICD codes for T2DM, HTN, HLD and OSA

LLM F1-scores, primary ICD-based analysis (range)

0.815 to 0.948

Further findings

LLM performance vs manual review (sensitivity analysis)

Accuracy for T2DM
0.963
Accuracy for Hypertension (HTN)
0.971
Accuracy for Hyperlipidemia (HLD)
0.863
Accuracy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)
0.966
F1-scores (range)
0.879 to 0.981
  • Sensitivity analysis

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Evaluating a large language model for identifying key comorbidities in discharge summaries of patients with obesity: a comparative validation study against ICD codes using MIMIC-IV. Int J Obes (Lond). Published 8 July 2026. doi:10.1038/s41366-026-02145-9

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.