Pituitary & hypothalamus

Efficacy and safety of cavernous sinus medial wall resection in pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and a single-arm meta-analysis

PituitaryPublished Systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Authors' conclusion

The cavernous sinus was ruled out, proving the MWCS excision is safe. Limiting population selection to Knosp 3A or lower enhanced GTR frequencies and lowered recurrence, according to subgroup analyses. This meta-analysis shows that MWCS resection can be a beneficial treatment option for pituitary tumors, when there is no macroscopic medial wall invasion and careful patient selection is done, especially for GH- and ACTH-producing tumors that can cause life-threatening metabolic changes.

Study context

Population
Patients with pituitary adenomas undergoing resection of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus (CS)8 studies
Outcome
Endocrinological remission after MWCS resection

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Pooled proportion of endocrinological remission (ER)

Pooled proportion of endocrinological remission (ER)

63.3%

Further pooled results

OutcomeValues
Gross total resection (GTR)MWCS resection pooled proportion 72.9%

Subgroups: Knosp 3A or lower

Limiting selection to Knosp 3A or lower enhanced gross total resection (GTR) frequencies and lowered recurrence

Safety

OutcomeValues
ICA injuryMinimal morbidityMWCS resection pooled ratio 0.5%

Original publication

Efficacy and safety of cavernous sinus medial wall resection in pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and a single-arm meta-analysis. Pituitary. Published 29 June 2023. doi:10.1007/s11102-023-01332-5

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.