Type 1 diabetes

Effectiveness of Educational and Psychoeducational Self‐Management Interventions in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Pediatr DiabetesPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

There is a lack of robust evidence that current self-management interventions result in clinically meaningful improvements in HbA1c and QoL.

Study context

Population
Children and adolescents with T1D; RCTs from 1994 up to May 2024, five databases46 papers · 30 interventions
Comparison
Educational and psychoeducational self-management interventions vs control
Outcome
HbA1c (short-term)
Follow-up
Short-term
Methodological detailsrandom effects model, PRISMA 2020, prespecified subgroup analyses
  • Random effects model
  • PRISMA 2020
  • Prespecified subgroup analyses

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

  • Small short-term improvement in HbA1c with self-management interventions

Further pooled results

Psychoeducational vs education-only interventions (prespecified subgroup analyses)

No significant difference in effectiveness

Quality of included studies

Low quality; studies with high risk of bias
27

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Effectiveness of Educational and Psychoeducational Self‐Management Interventions in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Pediatr Diabetes. Published 8 October 2024. doi:10.1155/2024/2921845

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.