Type 1 diabetes

Interventions to reduce diabetes-related distress among adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

DiabetologiaPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

Psychological interventions reduced diabetes distress among adults with type 1 diabetes and those with type 2 diabetes, while devices reduced diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes and education reduced diabetes distress in adults with type 2 diabetes. Most other interventions showed little or no clear effect.

Study context

Population
Adults (≥18 years) with T1D or T2D in RCTs recording diabetes distress
Participants
55,497 adults248 trials
Comparison
Interventions vs usual care or active control
  • Psychological interventionsn = 59 trials
  • Psychoeducational interventionsn = 68 trials
  • Miscellaneous interventionsn = 121 trials
Outcome
Diabetes distress measured with a validated questionnaire (SMD)
Methodological detailsrandom-effects meta-analysis, GRADE certainty assessment, Cochrane RoB2 risk of bias, Searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, APA PsycInfo and CINAHL to 23 September 2024, No meta-analyses for telehealth, health behaviours and mixed interventions due to heterogeneity or insufficient studies
  • Random-effects meta-analysis
  • GRADE certainty assessment
  • Cochrane RoB2 risk of bias
  • Searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, APA PsycInfo and CINAHL to 23 September 2024
  • No meta-analyses for telehealth, health behaviours and mixed interventions due to heterogeneity or insufficient studies

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Diabetes distress
SMD (95% CI)
Psychological interventionsvs Usual careT1D; N=16; GRADE = low
−0.22(−0.35 to −0.08)
Psychological interventionsvs Usual careT2D; N=21; GRADE = very low
−0.31(−0.50 to −0.13)
CGM or intermittently scanned glucose monitoringvs Standard blood glucose measurementT1D; N=6; GRADE = moderate
−0.26(−0.41 to −0.11)
Educational interventionsvs Usual careT2D; N=3; GRADE = low
−0.34(−0.56 to −0.11)

Further pooled results

Other comparisons (psychological, psychoeducational, peer support, educational and device-based interventions vs active controls or usual care)

Other comparisons did not show statistically significant effects

Certainty of evidence (GRADE)

Comparisons with moderate certainty
two
Comparisons with low certainty
five
Comparisons with very low certainty
seven

Predefined subgroups (baseline distress, delivery method, risk of bias, trial duration)

Results did not differ meaningfully across predefined subgroups

Telehealth, health behaviours and assorted mixed interventions

No meta-analyses could be conducted due to heterogeneity or an insufficient number of studies

Original publication

Interventions to reduce diabetes-related distress among adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Diabetologia. Published 11 September 2026. doi:10.1007/s00125-026-06789-0

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.