Type 2 & other diabetes

Effect of intensive blood pressure control on cognitive outcomes and brain structures in adults with type 2 diabetes: prespecified analysis of secondary outcomes of BPROAD randomised controlled trial

BMJPublished Multicentre, open label, outcome assessor masked, randomised controlled trial

Primary result · Composite of all cause dementia or mild cognitive impairmentResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 0.96 95% CI 0.86–1.06

Authors' conclusion

Over a median of about four years, no statistically significant difference in incidence of a composite of all cause dementia or mild cognitive impairment was observed among adults with type 2 diabetes receiving standard treatment of SBP (target <140 mm Hg) and intensive treatment (target <120 mm Hg). Intensive treatment was, however, associated with a reduction in the accrual of cerebral white matter lesion volume.

Study context

Population
Adults aged ≥50 years with type 2 diabetes, raised systolic blood pressure (SBP), and increased cardiovascular risk, without probable dementia at baseline; 145 clinical centres across seven geographical regions in Chinawithout probable dementia at baseline, included in the cognitive ancillary study (of 12,821 in the trial) · magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline 862 · MRI at end of study 605
Participants
12,434 adults
Comparison
Intensive treatment targeting SBP <120 mm Hg vs standard treatment targeting SBP <140 mm Hg for up to five years
  • INTENSIVEn = 6,219
  • STANDARDn = 6,215reference
Primary endpoint
Composite of:
  • All cause dementia
  • Mild cognitive impairment
Follow-up
Median 3.8 years
Methodological detailsprespecified analysis of secondary outcomes, cognitive ancillary study
  • Prespecified analysis of secondary outcomes
  • Cognitive ancillary study

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Hazard ratio

0.96

95% CI 0.86–1.06

P = 0.38

Events by treatment group

INTENSIVE

3.69 events per 100 person years

747 of 6219

STANDARD

3.89 events per 100 person years

783 of 6215

INTENSIVEvs STANDARD
hazard ratio 0.96 (95% CI 0.86–1.06); P = 0.38

Further findings

OutcomeBetween group difference (inverse hyperbolic sine (asinh) transformed cm³) (95% CI)P value
Increase in white matter lesion volume (MRI substudy)−0.09 (−0.15 to −0.02)P = 0.01

Mean SBP · after one year

  • Increase in white matter lesion volume (MRI substudy): smaller increase with intensive treatment; MRI substudy 428 intensive v 434 standard

Baseline characteristics

Baseline mean age
63.7 years
Women
5567 (44.8%)

Original publication

Effect of intensive blood pressure control on cognitive outcomes and brain structures in adults with type 2 diabetes: prespecified analysis of secondary outcomes of BPROAD randomised controlled trial. BMJ. Published 12 November 2026. doi:10.1136/bmj-2026-101209

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.