Does high‐normal blood pressure lead to excess cardiovascular disease events and deaths in Chinese people? A post‐hoc analysis of the 30‐year follow‐up of the Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study

Diabetes Obes MetabPublished Post-hoc analysis of the Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study

Authors' conclusion

This post-hoc study provided no evidence that the high-normal BP increased cardiovascular risk in the Da Qing study population, suggesting that it was reasonable to continue to define hypertension at 140/90 mmHg in China.

Study context

Population
Individuals from the original Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study, China
Participants
1,726 individuals
Comparison
High-normal BP and hypertension vs normal BP
Primary endpoint
CVD events
Follow-up
30-year (1986–2016)
Methodological details30-year follow-up
  • 30-year follow-up

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

30-year follow-up
Each group vs normal BPHazard ratio (95% CI)P value
High-normal BPadjusted for covariates
1.05(0.84–1.30)
P = 0.68
Hypertension
1.91(1.48–2.46)
P < 0.0001

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)P value
Coronary heart disease · 30-year follow-upHigh-normal BPvs Normal BPAdjusted for covariates1.12 (0.77–1.63)P = 0.57
Coronary heart disease · 30-year follow-upHypertensionvs Normal BP1.73 (1.12–2.67)P = 0.01
Stroke · 30-year follow-upHigh-normal BPvs Normal BPAdjusted for covariates1.05 (0.82–1.34)P = 0.71
Stroke · 30-year follow-upHypertensionvs Normal BP1.90 (1.43–2.52)P < 0.0001
CVD deaths · 30-year follow-upHigh-normal BPvs Normal BPAdjusted for covariates1.15 (0.82–1.60)P = 0.41
CVD deaths · 30-year follow-upHypertensionvs Normal BP2.07 (1.43–3.01)P = 0.0001

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) events by diabetes status (subgroups)

Regardless of diabetes, high-normal BP did not increase CVD events vs normal BP

Original publication

Does high‐normal blood pressure lead to excess cardiovascular disease events and deaths in Chinese people? A post‐hoc analysis of the 30‐year follow‐up of the Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 27 November 2023. doi:10.1111/dom.15379

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.