Obesity

Development and Validation of a Measure Identifying Patients With Obesity by BMI Without an Official Diagnosis

J Clin Endocrinol MetabPublished Measure development and validation study

Authors' conclusion

Findings highlight the clinical importance of documenting obesity in the EHR. Patients with an obesity diagnosis were more likely to lose weight, supporting the measure's predictive validity. This measure addresses gaps in obesity care, promoting early identification, targeted interventions, and better outcomes. Its feasibility as an EHR-based measure enhances adaptability across healthcare settings.

Study context

Population
Patients with obesity by BMI, 6 medical groups (124 clinics, 3483 providers), 2022
Participants
295,372 eligible patients
Comparison
Patients with vs without an obesity diagnosis in the electronic health record (EHR)
Outcome
Obesity diagnosis rates and measure reliability
Methodological detailspilot-tested across 6 medical groups, EHR-based
  • Pilot-tested across 6 medical groups
  • EHR-based

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Obesity diagnosis rates across medical groups

37.6% to 50.8%

Reliability, clinic-level

0.97

Reliability, provider-level

0.89

Further findings

OutcomeObesity diagnosisNo diagnosisP value
1-year weight change (predictive validity) · within the year following the index visitDiagnosed lost 0.34 lb; undiagnosed gained 1.78 lbaverage −0.34 poundsaverage 1.78 poundsP = 0.026
  • 1-year weight change (predictive validity): predictive cohort of 1132 patients with ≥1 follow-up weight

Original publication

Development and Validation of a Measure Identifying Patients With Obesity by BMI Without an Official Diagnosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Published 18 August 2025. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf464

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.