Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

Cost Analysis of a Fracture Liaison Service: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Secondary Prevention After Fragility Fractures of the Hip

Endocr PractPublished Cost analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

The present analysis shows that medication cost is the critical component in cost-effectiveness of an FLS program. The FLS program costs would be significantly lower if patients are prescribed less expensive drugs to treat osteoporosis. Additional work needs to be performed refining the medication algorithm considering medication costs but individualized to patient needs based on fracture risk.

Study context

Population
Patients with hip fragility fractures180 analysed for costs
Participants
200 patients
Comparison
FLS program; cost vs savings from reduced secondary fractures
Methodological detailshospital-based
  • Hospital-based

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Overall cost per patient enrolled in the FLS · 2-year period

Overall cost per patient, study medication algorithm

$1189

Overall cost per patient if IV zoledronic acid used

$489

Overall cost per patient if only oral bisphosphonates used

$159

Medication share of costs; main factor for FLS costs exceeding savings

89%

Original publication

Cost Analysis of a Fracture Liaison Service: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Secondary Prevention After Fragility Fractures of the Hip. Endocr Pract. Published 2 August 2023. doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2023.07.030

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.