Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

Comparative Effectiveness of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide in Women 50 Years of Age and Older: Update of a Real-World Retrospective Analysis

Endocr PractPublished Retrospective cohort study

Main finding · Hip fractureResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 0.83 95% CI 0.70–0.98

Authors' conclusion

There were significantly lower rates of hip and nonvertebral fractures with abaloparatide compared to teriparatide, which were consistent across subgroups. No differences in cardiovascular safety were noted between cohorts.

Study context

Population
Women aged ≥50 years initiating abaloparatide or teriparatide, anonymized claims data (ICON's Symphony Health, PatientSource)21,676 per cohort, matched
Participants
21,676 vs 21,676
Exposure
Abaloparatide vs teriparatide
  • Abaloparatiden = 21,676
  • Teriparatiden = 21,676reference
Outcome
Time to first hip fracture, nonvertebral fracture and serious cardiovascular event
Follow-up
18 months (+ 30 days )
Methodological detailsclaims data, propensity score-matched cohorts, Cox proportional hazards models
  • Claims data
  • Propensity score-matched cohorts
  • Cox proportional hazards models

Main finding

Hip fracture

Hazard ratio

0.83

95% CI 0.70–0.98

P = 0.027

Events by group

Abaloparatidevs Teriparatide
HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.70–0.98); P = 0.027

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeAbaloparatideTeriparatideHR (95% CI)P value
Nonvertebral fracture · 18 months (+ 30 days follow-up)4.4%5.0%0.88 (0.80–0.96)P = 0.003

Treatment exposure >12 months

Treatment-subgroup interactions (age, prior antiresorptive use, prior fracture)

No significant treatment-subgroup interactions
P ≥ 0.2

Safety

Serious cardiovascular events

Cardiovascular events were similar between groups

Original publication

Comparative Effectiveness of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide in Women 50 Years of Age and Older: Update of a Real-World Retrospective Analysis. Endocr Pract. Published 16 November 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2024.10.017

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.